<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximize storage card performance and reliability with Defragment Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilitydigest.com/maximize-storage-card-performance-and-reliability-with-defragment-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilitydigest.com/maximize-storage-card-performance-and-reliability-with-defragment-mobile/</link>
	<description>Cell Phones, Netbooks, Laptops, and Accessories reviewed and discussed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:15:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BRYAN B</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilitydigest.com/maximize-storage-card-performance-and-reliability-with-defragment-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>BRYAN B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilitydigest.com/maximize-storage-card-performance-and-reliability-with-defragment-mobile/#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>Im certiantly not an SD card expert,buuuuuuttt,defragmentating hard disk contents is done because when files are scattered all over the disk, the access time of the drive increases, since the 
driveheads have to make more movements to reach all parts of the files. 
Since there are no mechanical moving parts present in memorycards, the time-gain, if there is any, will be minimal. So I question the real need to do it, though I don&#039;t think it will harm anything either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im certiantly not an SD card expert,buuuuuuttt,defragmentating hard disk contents is done because when files are scattered all over the disk, the access time of the drive increases, since the<br />
driveheads have to make more movements to reach all parts of the files.<br />
Since there are no mechanical moving parts present in memorycards, the time-gain, if there is any, will be minimal. So I question the real need to do it, though I don&#8217;t think it will harm anything either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
